Order 1 mg finpecia with visa
In October 1973 he went to say good-bye to one of his children, and said that he planned to go away, and did not know when he would return. Since there are no witnesses that he was arrested, and since he told a son that he was leaving, and explicitly asked them not to look for him, this Commission has not been able to come to a conviction that he suffered a fatal human rights violation or political violence. Witnesses say that sometime in early January 1974, police from the Salto Pilmaiquйn checkpoint, which was under the authority of the Third station in Rahue Bajo, Osorno, arrested him at the boarding house where he lived. A few days previously the owner of the boarding house had been arrested, and the domestic servant had been found dead. After being arrested, Gonzбlez is said to have been executed and his body was left nearby. For lack of sufficient evidence, the Commission was unable to come to a conviction that he had suffered a fatal human rights violation or political violence. The arrest was made by members of the investigative police, and they took him to their headquarters on Calle General Mackenna. According to his family, the investigative police said that he was going to be released the next day. On November 27, however, they were told that Gonzбlez had hung himself in his cell with his shirt. The family says that Gonzбlez was being accused of being involved in the so-called "Plan Leopard. He was beaten with rifle butts and kicked by troops from the 1033 Tejas Verdes Regiment as they were searching his house on November 21, 1973. This Commission is not in a position to attribute them to the mistreatment described, and hence it could not come to a conviction on whether he was a victim of political violence. Her relatives say that on September 13, 1973, she and a sister took advantage of the fact that permission had been given to people to leave their houses to buy some groceries. One of her brothers who had been told what happened came to the area and saw that she had a bullet wound on the back of her head. The relatives say it was very difficult to get permission to have her buried; they did not have a death certificate since the body had been picked up on a public thoroughfare. They say that a doctor at the Barros Luco Hospital later helped them and wrote them a certificate stating that the cause of death was "rheumatic fever. This Commission did not come to a conviction on what happened, and hence it could not determine the exact cause of death. The accounts the Commission has received indicate that on September 7, 1973 [sic], a navy patrol came and shot him down in his home. They then took his body to the Van Bъren Hospital in Valparaнso where he died shortly thereafter. For lack of enough evidence, the Commission was unable to come to a conviction on whether he was a victim of a human rights violation. The family received accounts from witnesses that he and other people were arrested for curfew violation. The family looked for him in a number of sites but was unable to determine his whereabouts. The Commission did not come to a conviction on this case because it regards the evidence presented as insufficient to determine what happened to Hйctor Inostroza. According to information supplied by his relatives, he was arrested that day and has not been heard from again. However, he is registered as having renewed his identification card in 1034 December 1974. Because it received this information only toward the end of its work and could not carry out a thorough investigation, the Commission has not come to a conviction on this case. The family has testified to the Commission that he was a second corporal in the band at the Military Academy. His parents, who live in Valparaнso, have had no information on him since September 1973. The Commission cannot come to a conviction on whether Josй Leiva was a victim of a human rights violation because it does not have enough evidence. This Commission has not been able to gather more evidence to confirm this account, and hence it has not come to a conviction on this case. He had taken asylum in the French embassy after being summoned by the junta to report to the authorities. He had apparently died of natural causes, and hence there was no judicial investigation nor was any autopsy performed.
Order finpecia amex
No facts may be introduced in this meeting that are not contained in the record upon which the initial review panel made its decision. In the event the panel decides to have a meeting with the appealing institution, panel members may ask questions of any person participating in the meeting. A verbatim transcript of the meeting may be taken at the cost of the Board if the final review panel determines that a transcript would assist the panel in carrying out its responsibilities. A meeting provided under this process is not governed by formal rules of evidence. The final review panel may make any procedural rulings reasonably necessary to facilitate the effective and efficient operation of the meeting. The scope of the final review shall be confined to the record upon which the initial review panel made its decision. The final review panel shall determine whether the decision of the initial review panel is reasonable. In reaching this determination, the panel should consider whether the decision was based on a consideration of the applicable law, regulations, and policy, and whether there has been a clear error of judgment. The final review panel may affirm the decision of the initial review panel even if it is possible to draw a contrary conclusion from the record presented on appeal. Within 21 calendar days of the filing of a request for final review, the director of the appropriate division of the Board shall provide written notice of the decision of the final review panel to the senior management and the board of directors of the institution. The final review panel may continue, terminate, or otherwise modify the material supervisory determination(s) at issue or remand consideration of the material supervisory determination at issue to the examiners who made the determination to allow them to consider additional evidence presented in connection with the appeal. In cases in which redaction is deemed insufficient to prevent improper disclosure, the published decision may be presented in summary form. The final review panel may extend the period for issuing a decision by up to 30 calendar days if the panel determines that, based on the facts and circumstances of the appeal, an extension is appropriate. The Ombudsman will not have substantive involvement in or act as a decision-maker with respect to the appeal. Effect of Appeal on Material Supervisory Determinations A material supervisory determination shall remain in effect while under appeal unless and until such time as it is modified or terminated through the appeals process. In such cases, the rights of appeal provided for in the statutes and regulations concerning those actions shall govern. If the institution is placed into receivership while an appeal is outstanding, the appeal will be considered moot and will not be completed. Safeguards Against Retaliation Neither the Federal Reserve nor any employee of the Federal Reserve may retaliate against an institution or person, including based on the filing or outcome of an appeal under this process. In accordance with longstanding Federal Reserve practice, the appeals framework is intended to foster an environment where concerns and issues may be freely and openly discussed. The Ombudsman may attempt to resolve a claim of retaliation informally by engaging in discussions with the concerned institution and the appropriate Board or Reserve Bank staff. Nothing in this guidance is intended to prevent the Ombudsman from initiating a factual inquiry into alleged retaliation at any time. The Ombudsman may initiate a factual inquiry into a claim of retaliation, at any time, by providing notice to the director of the appropriate division of the Board and appropriate Board committee, and the officer in charge of supervision at the appropriate Reserve Bank. As part of the inquiry, the Ombudsman may collect and review documents, interview witnesses, and consult Board and Reserve Bank staff with subject matter expertise. The Ombudsman also may request that the director of the appropriate division of the Board authorize or assign such additional resources as necessary to assist the Ombudsman in fully reviewing the matter. In addition, the Ombudsman ensures that safeguards exist to encourage complainants to come forward and to protect confidentiality. The Ombudsman assists institutions with issues and questions related to Reserve Bank or Board regulatory activities. In doing so, the Ombudsman shall operate independently of the supervisory process to the extent necessary to ensure that appropriate safeguards exist to encourage complainants to come forward and preserve confidentiality. In situations where the Board has not established a process for addressing a certain type of question or complaint, the Ombudsman is available to facilitate the resolution of the question or complaint. Although the Ombudsman does not have decision-making authority regarding any substantive matters, including supervisory determinations and regulatory action (other than for retaliation claims), the Ombudsman is available to assist institutions, and particularly community banks, in locating the correct Federal Reserve System staff person to address or resolve such a question or complaint and may coordinate meetings and facilitate discussions between the institution and System staff, including senior officials, as necessary. In order to facilitate this process, the Ombudsman may investigate the situation in order to identify the relevant facts and circumstances.
Cheap finpecia 1mg fast delivery
The Commission has examined these cases very rigorously, especially when the remains of the victim have not been found. However, it cannot 59 entirely rule out the possibility that in one or other isolated case it may have made the mistake of qualifying a person as "disappeared" and presuming him or her to be dead. The Commission hopes that in the future it will be possible to determine the truth about what has happened in such cases. The decision not to assign blame to particular individuals In carrying out its investigations, the Commission received information about the identity of government agents, both uniformed and civilian, and about people in their service, as well as about members of political parties or armed groups opposed to the military government, all of whom were said to have been involved in one or more of the events it was examining. Its founding decree forbade it to take a stand on the potential responsibility of individual persons in these events in accordance with existing legislation. The reasons for that prohibition are both clear and compelling: only the courts of justice can determine the responsibility of particular persons for crimes committed. If this report had included the names of those presumed responsible, whether of government agents or private citizens, the practical result would be that a commission appointed by the executive branch would be publicly accusing of committing crimes people who had not been able to defend themselves. Indeed, they had no such obligation to defend themselves since the Commission did not have any judicial authority, nor indeed did it prosecute any case. Such a procedure would have been an obvious violation of the principles of the rule of law and of the separation of the powers of government, as well as of the basic norms of respect for human rights. Those considerations notwithstanding, in all relevant cases the Commission has sent the respective items of evidence to the courts. Determining the institution or group In this report the Commission is offering as much information 60 as it could obtain about actions committed by government agents except for the names of the individuals alleged to have participated. Thus when such information is available the report names the branch or branches of the armed forces or police forces or the security or intelligence agencies said to have participated, and specifically the regiment, base, police precinct, garrison, or group from which the official forces came. When the Commission was unable to obtain such information but did come to the conviction that the person was killed by, or disappeared in the hands of, government agents, it has stated so. When available, the Commission has also provided information on the political affiliation of private citizens who committed terrorist acts or other kinds of politically motivated attacks. The Commission has not presumed that government agents were involved in the death of individuals, even when it is clear that they were killed by firearms and when there is every reason to believe that the motivation was political, unless there are grounds for that judgement. Hence it has stated that the human rights of some people were violated for political reasons, without, however, attributing the deed either to government agents or to private citizens acting for political reasons. Motivation of the perpetrators In order that instances of attacks by private citizens be regarded as within the competence of this Commission, it is essential that there has been political motivation. As already noted, when government agents have committed violations, political motivation is of no concern. In fact, the Commission judges that in most cases of death inflicted by government agents, such motivation has been present either specifically, in an effort to eliminate certain people because of their political membership or activities, or more generally, in order to gain access to power, impose order, or intimidate real or potential political opponents. However, the Commission also examined cases in which common criminals were killed by government agents in what was ostensibly a campaign against crime. Reference to private citizens When the Commission here refers to perpetrators as private citizens acting for political reasons or pretexts, it does not always mean that these were people who were opposed to the 61 military government. In some cases the political motives of such private citizens were quite the contrary, that is, they supported the government. In some of these cases, which will be narrated in the chapter on those killed during protest actions, the Commission does not rule out the possibility that such private citizens were really security agents in civilian dress. Connection between torture and death As has already been noted, the Commission judged that it was obligated to come to a reasonable and honest judgement on whether the torture a person had undergone either caused, led to, or contributed to his or her death. Making such a determination is especially difficult when a relatively long time has elapsed between the treatment suffered and subsequent death. The medical specialists whose opinion the Commission sought whenever there was doubt, always pointed out that in most cases medical science can only provide estimates of probability. Nevertheless, their expert opinions proved extremely valuable for establishing the parameters within which the Commission made its decision in conscience. It is not the role of the Commission to take a stand on the events that took place on that date and immediately thereafter, that is, on whether they were justified or not, or whether there was or was not some other way out of the conflict that led to those events. There can be, and indeed are, various opinions on these issues, and quite legitimately so.
|Comparative prices of Finpecia|
|1||OSI Restaurant Partners||843|
|3||Whole Foods Markets||464|
|5||Army Air Force Exchange||699|
Generic 1 mg finpecia with mastercard
These experiments were requested by the S S judge, Morgen, who investigated the criminal case against Koch, camp commander of Buchenwald, and the defendant Hoven. Hoven was suspected of having killed a witness against Koch and himself by means of poison. The poison was administered to the experimental subjects in their food without their knowledge. All four survived, but were strangled in a crematorium of the concentration camp in order that autopsies could be performed. On 11 September 1944 Mrugowsky and Ding carried out an experiment with aconitine nitrate projectiles in the Sachsenhausen concentration camp. I n the other three cases, the suffering of the experimental subjects was terrible. He defended himself on the ground that he was the legally appointed executioner in this case. Assuming the truth of this absurd statement, i t cannot be held legal to torture to death prisoners of war even if they had been validly sentenced to death. On 26 October 1944 still another poison experiment was carried out by Ding in Buchenwald. These experiments-were connected with the poison bullet experiments in the Sachsenhausen concentration camp, (Tr. It showed that the examination of the question of whether the noxious effect of serums containing phenol can be proved by the comparative use of serums with and without, phenol, and also a series of experiments with serums containing phenol was never carried out. I proved that no harm was caused to the health of the experimental subjects by these experiments. I n the experiments i t was used together with a narcotic because the authority wanted to determine whether, as a result of this treatment, the effect was increased one way or the other. The only effect was that the experimental subjects fell into a disturbed sleep for up to 20 hours. This pervitin experiment was not ordered by Mrugowsky; he did not participate therein in any a-ay, and the prosecution did not even contend that he knew of it. No responsibility under criminal law may be deduced against him, from this experiment. I n respect to this special experiment, there is no evidence whatsoever to show the type of poison used, the manner in which the special experiment was performed, and the aim of the experiment. After the collapse, Ding told the defendant Sievers that towards the end of 1944 in Buchenwald he had filled 80 phials with prussic acid in order to commit suicide, but he unfortunately took none of them with him. The Ding diary states that the experiment was performed by order of Mrugowsky and the Reich Criminal Police Office. Because the diary has such little probative value, the truth of this contention cannot be proved by this document alone. No other evidence has been submitted to show that Ding poisoned 6 prisoners by order of Mrugowsky. Therefore there is no conclusive evidence to prove that Mrugowsky ordered this experiment or that he even knew about it. The prosecution further indicted Mrugowsky because of an execution performed at Sachsenhausen i n which ten bandits sentenced to death were executed with bullets poisoned with aconitine. I have proved that Mrugowsky attended this execution only as the usual doctor present at an execution. I further demonstrated that the execution took place because, in an attempt on the life of a high-ranking civil servant in the General Government, Russian revolver ammunition had been used in which hollow bullets had been filled with aconitine poison. I proved that poisoned ammunition was used at the execution to determine whether pure aconitine or a poison mixture had been used in the bullets, and how much time would be available in case of need to administer antidotes. I proved that all executions in the concentration camps were ordered by the Reich Criminal Police Office, and that the presence of a doctor at such executions was prescribed. No charge under criminal law can be deduced against Mrugowsky from his attendance as a doctor at the execution. Spanische Allee 10-1% Top Secret Subject: Experiments with aconitine nitrate projectiles To the Criminological Institute attn: Dr.
Order finpecia 1mg without prescription
During my time about 10 percent of the total number of the inmates used, died as a result. I heard that a larger number of the victims died after my time, that is, about 20 percent. The selection of inmates to be used for the purposes of medical experiments in Block 46 by the Division for Typhus and Virus Research was as follows: Whenever Dr. Ding needed human beings for his work, a request was made to the office of the camp commandant and referred to me for action. I n acobrdance with this request I selected various inmates, a t random, from the roster of the camp. They were placed on a list over my signature and returned to Schober, who often removed certain names from the list for political reasons. I n the event of particular prisoners being removed from the list, I was requested to select substitutes i n order to provide Dr. H e made a final check to ascertain, from a medical point of view, the physical condition of the selected inmates and to determine whether or not they met with his requirements. It has been established that the need exists to test the efficacy of, and resistance of the human body to, the typhus serum extracted from the egg yolks. Since tests Ion animals are not of sufficient value, tests on human beings must be carried out. Five experimental subjects received intramuscular and subcutaneous injections of vitelline membrane diluted 1:25 with an emulsified Rickettsia-Prowazeki strain from the Robert Koch Institute in doses of 1 cc. Through continuous blood pictures a strong surplus of neutrophile myelocytes was discovered. A11 persons experimented on fell sick with typhus except two who, as was established later, had already had typhus during an epidemic a t the police prison in Berlin. S S Hauptsturmfuehrer Hoven, station medical officer of the Waffen S S in Weimar, is supervising the stations i n the meantime (Blocks 44 and 49). This research series was observed for 6 weeks and then abandoned without results, as no sickness broke out in the control group. To test the effect of the immunization, the infection is to be carriea out with lice suffering from typhus. The lice and their cages must be burnt immediately, as the latter became leaky during transport, and therefore represent a danger of epidemic in Buchenwald camp. Report made that infection with live typhus lice is not possible because the danger to the camp inmates is too great. Inspection of quarters and advice to the medical officer on the fighting of the epidemic. Genzken, the typhus research station at the Buchenwald concentration camp becomes the "Division for Typhus and Virus Research. Preparation 3,582 "Acridine" of the chemical pharmaceutical and sero-bacteriological department in Frankfurt-on-Main, Hoechst, Professor Lautenschlaeger and Dr. Behring Works, Marburg- 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23. Production is being abandoned for the time being because of the military situation. A second injection on 8 December 1942, a third injection on 13 December 1942, of a typhus vaccination for immunization was carried out on Sister Lilli Boehm, born on 3 April 1912, by resident surgeon Dr. Forty-eight hours after the last vaccination, death in coma in the German clinic in Kovno. Klauberg slide During animal experiments, guinea pigs and mice were vaccinated intraperitoneally and under the skin of the back. They were dysentery bacteriophaga which could be clearly diagnosed by animal and culture experiments; this can be used for therapeutic purposes in cases of diarrhea. Ding ordered to Paris to procure laboratory material for the Division for Typhus and Virus Research, and the Institute of Hygiene.
Buy cheap finpecia 1mg online
For the second inoculation I do not have the sporocoides material because I do not possess the Strain Rose in the anopheles yet. If you could find it possible t o send me a few anopheles infected with Strain Rose during the next few days (in the last consignment 2 out of 10 mosquitoes were infected), I would be able to continue this experimat and I would naturally be very grateful to you for this new support of my work. He must have renamed this strain which came from my department and called it Rose. Yes, that indicates that 13 days after the letter was mailed, 12 days after it arrived at the Robert Koch Institute, I saw it. I find that in spite of my instructioiis to the department, Fraeulein von Falkenhayn still sent mosquitoes to her old chief although she denies it now; but I should like to emphasize that, of course, I am responsible for what Fraeulein von Falkenhayn did even if she did not tell me about it. Did you rea5rm your instructions that no more material was to be sent to Schilling? It is not even certain that I was in the Robert Koch Institute when I saw the letter. It is much more likely that Frau Block brought this letter to my home where such things were generally settled. And, from the fact that it; had been dealt with 10 days before, you can see that such letters were opened by my secretary. As a type of anopheles I had anopheles eggs maculipenis atroparvus in my laboratory. This one is dated a year later-5 July 1943, acknowledging, "with appreciation the receipt of your letter of 30 June and the consignment of atroparvus eggs. Now, Doctor, apparently they completely ignored your orders of the year previous not to send any more material to Schilling. I have already stated expressly that my orders not to send any more material to Schilling meant that we did not have too much material ourselves. It did not mean that I had any misgivings about the way in which Schilling was carrying out his work. It is quite possible that when we again had plenty of mosquito eggs we gave some to Schilling again. You see here again that this matter was apparently dealt with by Fraeulein Lange and Schilling himself wrote to me again. I have told you that I cannot testify with any certainty to the details of such correspondence because I had too much correspondence. We have the testimony of Fraeulein von Falkenhayn that the department for fever therapy never gave them any material and, at that time, I no longer had an office in Berlin. I myself was at Pfaffenrode once a month at the most, and I called up once or twice over long distance. There must have been plenty of mosquito eggs, sa that we could give up some of them. Introduction the defendants Karl Brandt, Handloser, Rostock, Gebhardt, Blome, Rudolf Brandt, and Sievers were charged with slpecial responsibility for and participation in criminal conduct involving mustard gas experiment (indictment, par. On this charge the defendants Karl Brandt, Rudolf Brandt, and Sievers were convicted and the defendants Handloser, Rostock, Gebhardt, and Blome were acquitted. A corresponding summation of the evidence by the defense on these experiments has been selected from t h a closing briefs for the defendants Karl Brandt and Sievers. This argumentation is followed by selection from the evidence on pages 336 to 354. On 1 March 1944, the Fuehrer gave Karl Brandt broad powers in the Eeld of chemical warfare. Moreover, Brandt admitted he talked to Hirt in Strasbourg in April after the meeting with Sievers. Brandt testified that the gas experiments of Bickenbach came to his attention in the fall of 1943 on the occasion of a visit to Strasbourg to see a cyclotron; that later he helped him to arrange a laboratory; that he assisted him in obtaining experimental animals; that Bickenbach did not conduct experiments on human beings;that he helped him in 1944 after he had established this laboratory. Bickenbach, without instructions from Hirt and Professor Stein, contacted General Commissioner Professor Dr. Brandt concerning the phosgene experiments that were [and was] in Natzweiler with him. This is in direct contradiction to statements contained in an official war crimes report of the Government of the Netherhnds. These reports on the phosgene experiments are designated top military secret and are numbered 2,3,4,5,6, and 7. These reports obviously cover the same series of experiments which culminated in experiments on 40 prisoners detailed in the 7th report.
Purchase generic finpecia pills
Objective: We describe which groups of infectious diseases were most often acquired during international travel from Norway in 2011, and characteristics of the cases in order to better target prevention strategies. We describe the cases by age, type on infection, reason for travelling and country of infection. Most of the cases were between 20-49 years (66%) and infected in Spain (17%), Turkey (14%) and Thailand (14%). The most frequent reasons for travelling among these cases were tourism (2,382 cases; 82%) and immigrants visiting their former country of residence (237; 8%). Among tourists, the groups of infections most frequently reported were gastrointestinal (86%) and sexually transmitted infections (7%). Among immigrants visiting their former country of residence, gastrointestinal (50%) and vaccine preventable infections (10%) were the most commonly identified. This group was also found to be overrepresented in reported imported cases of four infections: malaria, hepatitis A, typhoid- and paratyphoid fever. Conclusions: Although age groups and place of infection probably reflect travelling patterns of international travel, we have identified specific groups of infections and target populations where Norwegian public health authorities should focus. Prevention strategies should concentrate on promoting food and water hygiene measures and safe sexual practices for tourists. In addition, special efforts should be made to ensure that immigrants visiting their former country of residence recognize that they are at special risk of acquiring diseases like malaria, hepatitis A, typhoid- and paratyphoid fever and that they should follow the general public health recommendations for travelers regarding preventive measures and vaccinations. Results: Sixty cases of human rabies in international travelers were reviewed from 1990-2012. Cases were not necessarily associated with long-term travel or expatriation to endemic countries; moreover, cases were seen in travelers undergoing short trips of 2 weeks or less. Among 28 patients whose confirmed diagnosis was obtained ante-mortem, the mean time between hospitalization and diagnosis was 8 days, including 4 cases with a delayed diagnosis by 15 days and over. In 5 cases, patient transited through 1 or more countries before ultimate hospitalization. Three factors played a role in delaying the diagnosis of rabies in a number of cases: (i) a low index of suspicion for rabies in countries where the disease has been eradicated since long time or is now rare, (ii) a negative history of animal bite or exposure to rabies, and (iii) atypical clinical presentation of the disease. Conclusion: Clinical symptomatology of rabies is complex and commonly causes confusion to physicians. Furthermore, failure of diagnosis of imported cases in more developed countries is probably related to the lack of medical familiarity even with typical clinical features of the disease. The sensitivity and specificity for IgM determination were 100% and 100%, respectively. Although not common in Canada, severe malaria has the potential for complicated and rapid outcomes making expedited access to appropriate treatment, not marketed in Canada, a crucial component of malaria management. The network is made up of 12 medical centres across Canada that facilitates strategically located supplies of effective treatment for severe malaria. For cases where the reason for travel was known, travellers visiting friends and relatives represented 25. There is an ongoing need for access to these lifesaving medications across the country, with increasing use in the past three years. Better availability of effective oral therapy may help to decrease life threatening cases. Zhang 1 Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Department of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai, China Introduction: Although the morbidity of malaria in China went down to 0. We report a case of successfully treated acute respiratory distress syndrome complicating imported P. Case report: A 42-year-old man was admitted to the hospital because of recurrent fever and rash for over one month, and lost conscious for 3 days. When he returned to China, one month before admission, fever, rash, vomiting, diarrhea and headache was presented. The patient had a temperature ranging from 38 to 40, despite the administration of antipyretic agents.
Buy 1 mg finpecia fast delivery
Since that time I have not received any news either concerning the film or concerning the report. You are requested to duly note and accord needed assistance to Hauptsturmfuehrer Dr. Rascher is being assigned by me to carry through the following experiments: 1 Low-pressure chamber experiments-to be carried out under. Determination of changes in chemical equilibrium, as well as gas equilibrium of human body. Experiments are to be repeated until a scientifically incontestable basis for findings is established. Testing of pressure-proof protection garments for the highest alti- tudes to be carried out with the assistance of manufacturers of such protective suits. Tests for reimparting warmth after total chilling of the human body, recording all changes of chemical and gas characteristics, are to be further continued until complete clarification of doubtful questions. I attach particular value to conditions for experiments coming as close to actual conditions as possible, particularly as regards reimpartation of warmth. Sauna equipment available in Dachau should be used i n connection with experiments on reimpartation of warmth. Experiments on removal of effects due to freezing of parts of human system, especially the extremities, to be carried through in suitable form. Experiments concerned with adaptation to freezing cold in snow huts (igloos) to be carried out under varying diets in order to establish whether adaptation to cold [German text says "Gewaehrung", i. Why do you remember the date when the first experiments were made in the low-pressure chambers so well? The 22d of February- is my birthday and the tubercular patients gave a party for me. Ten prisoners were selected and were taken to the station as permanent experimental subjects; and they were told that nothing would happen to thdm. One day, however, Rascher told me the next day he was going to make a serious experiment and that he would need 16 Russians who had been condemned to death, and he received these Russians. Then I told Rascher that I would not help, and I actually got Rascher to send me away to the tubercular ward. On the next day when I returned to the station, Endres was already there and he said that two more, two Jews, would be killed. I left the station again, but I matched to see who would be taken for the experiments. I went to the place where he worked, and I was told that Endres had just taken the man away. I told Romberg that this was not a person who had been condemned to death, that this was a clear case of murder on the responsibility of Endres. Romberg went with me to see Rascher to clear the matter up, but it was discovered that Endres had put this man in the experimental car because he had refused to make a civilian suit for him. Rascher sent the man back; Endres went with him and remarked: "Well, then you will get an injection today. I n the meantime, Endres had brought a second man up, a Czech, whom I knew very well. Again it was Romberg together with me who talked to Rascher to stop this experiment or to inquire why a man like Endres was simply taking people who had never been condemned to death. Rascher went to the camp commandant, Piorkowski, who personally came to the station and Endres was transferred to Lublin immediately. And now I come to the subject: it was actually the day on which my comrade and I reached the decision that under all circumstances, no matter what happened, I would not remain at thi* Q. Now, before you continue with your story, I would like to put some specific questions to you. It is true, is it not, that concentration camp inmates were experimented on during these high-altitude experiments?